in the reading passage, the The writer claims Three ways to save the rhino. In the lecture, however, the speaker challenges with what is stated in the reading passage.
To begin with. The writer claims that people can use more gentle ways like medicine to remove the horns from the rhino. However, what's stated in the listening passage rejects the fact in the reading material in the listening passage, it is not practical. The horns is vital to the rhinos' survival. They use their horse to find food or drink water. And they can't survive without the horns.
In addition, the writer goes on to discuss the issue that we can educate customers. This also conflicts with the points in the listening passage that woman believe that would not be effective. The rhino horns have big value in medicine. And people have the believe from the ancient time. Therefore it's hard to convince people although there are new significant evidence.