提纲参考答案
1. Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do youagree or disagree?
此题目实际上由两个部分构成（构成了因果关系），请注意两个部分都要回应。不上传提纲，直接上传一篇考官范文，请认真参考修改。这个文章最简单的写法就是像下面的范文一样每一个部分各自分开回应，两个部分的立场是各自自由的。
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example,rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
2. Some people think that the development of technology makes our life complex, and the solution is for everyone to accept a simpler life without using technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (2017.2.18日考题)
上面这个题目也是由两个部分组成。在写作的时候，我的立场会是我同意科技给我们的生活带来的一些复杂的东西，但是我不同意我们应该停止使用科技（请注意两个立场不是必须一致的）。
再给一个例子
Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? （很明显这个题目也是由两个部分组成）
Some people argue that we no longer remember the original meaning of festivals, and that most of us treat them as opportunities to have fun. While I agree that enjoyment seems to be the priority during festival times, I do not agree that people have forgotten what these festivals mean. (这是文章的开头段，大家关键是要理解两个部分都要回应)
