dispatch_once_t skills

Grand Central Dispatch, a.k.a libdispatch and usually referred to as GCD, is a low-level API known for performing asynchronous background work. dispatch_async is its poster child: “Throw this block on a background thread to do some work, and inside of that block toss another block on the main thread to update the UI.”

Not all of GCD is asynchronous, though. There’s dispatch_sync to do some work synchronously. There’s also dispatch_once that’s used to guarantee that something happens exactly once, no matter how violent the program’s threading becomes. It’s actually a very simple idiom:

    static dispatch_once_t onceToken;

    dispatch_once (&onceToken, ^{

        // Do some work that happens once

    });

You first declare a static or global variable of type dispatch_once_t. This is an opaque type that stores the “done did run” state of something. It’s important that your dispatch_once_t be a global or a static. If you forget the static, you may have weird behavior at run time.

Then you pass that dispatch_once_t token to dispatch_once, along with a block. GCD will guarantee that the block will run no more than one time, no matter how many threads you have contending for this one spot.

The usual example you see for dispatch_once is creating shared instances, such as the object returned from calls like -[NSFileManager defaultManager]. Wrap the allocation and initialization of your shared instance in a dispatch_once, and return it. Done.

Recently, though, I had an opportunity to use dispatch_once outside of a sharedBlah situation. Another Rancher and I were working on some sample code for a class. It populated a scrolling view with Lots And Lots Of Stuff. Rather than manually coming up with labels for everything, we used the list of words at /usr/share/dict/words to construct random names. Just a couple of words and string them together. The results were often nonsensical, but sometimes we’d get something delightfully random. Here’s the function:

static NSString *RandomName (int wordCount) {

    static NSArray *words;

    if (!words) {

        NSString *allTheWords =

            [NSString stringWithContentsOfFile: @"/usr/share/dict/words"

                      encoding: NSUTF8StringEncoding

                      error: nil];

        NSPredicate *shortWords = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:@"length < 8"];

        words = [[allTheWords componentsSeparatedByString:@"\n"]

                    filteredArrayUsingPredicate: shortWords];

    }

    NSMutableArray *nameParts = [NSMutableArray array];

    for (int i = 0; i < wordCount; i++) {

        NSString *word = [words objectAtIndex: random() % words.count];

        [nameParts addObject: word];

    }

    NSString *name = [nameParts componentsJoinedByString: @" "];

    return name;

} // RandomName

Pretty straightforward. A static local variable that points to an NSArray of words. Make a check for nilness, then load the file and remove the long words. And it worked great.

Then we decided to emulate network latency by using dispatch_async and coded delays to act like words were dribbling in over a network connection. Performance took an insane nose-dive, as in “there is no way I am checking this in and keeping my job”. A quick check with Instruments showed RandomName being the bottleneck. Every thread was running it. Whoa.

In retrospect, it’s an obvious mistake: accessing global state unprotected in a threaded environment. Here’s the scenario:

Thread A starts doing stuff. It goes to get a RandomName. It sees that words is nil, so it starts loading the words. GCD, when it sees a thread start blocking (say by going into the kernel reading a largish file), it realizes that it can start another thread running to keep those CPUs busy. So Thread B goes to get a RandomName. Thread A isn’t done loading the words, so words is still nil. Therefore Thread B starts reading the words file. It blocks, and goes to sleep, and Thread C starts up. Eventually all of the reads complete, and they all start processing this 235,886 line file. That’s a crazy amount of work.

It’s pretty to fix. You can slap an @synchronized around it. Or use NSLock, pthread_mutex, etc. I didn’t like those options because you do pay a locking price on each access. Granted, it’s a toy app purely for demonstration purposes, but I still think about that stuff. You can also put stuff like that into +initialize (with the proper class check), knowing the limited circumstances +initialize would get called. That didn’t excite me either. It was nice having RandomName being entirely self-contained and not dependent on some other entity initializing the set of words.

Taking a step back and evaluating the problem: words needs to be loaded and initialized exactly once, and then used forever more. What’s an existing library call that lets you do something exactly once? dispatch_once. We threw a dispatch_once at it, and now performance was decent again:

static NSString *RandomName (int wordCount) {

    static NSArray *words;

    static dispatch_once_t onceToken;

    dispatch_once (&onceToken;, ^{

        NSString *allTheWords =

            [NSString stringWithContentsOfFile: @"/usr/share/dict/words"

                      encoding: NSUTF8StringEncoding

                      error: nil];

        NSPredicate *shortWords = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:@"length < 8"];

        words = [[allTheWords componentsSeparatedByString:@"\n"]

                    filteredArrayUsingPredicate: shortWords];

    });

    NSMutableArray *nameParts = [NSMutableArray array];

    ...

We didn’t even have to modify the code in the block. Performance was back to reasonable levels, and we could get back to demonstrating our concept.

So what’s the point of all of this? Mainly that GCD is not just for running things concurrently - it’s a small pile of useful concurrency tools. dispatch_once is one of those tools, and has applicability outside of making shared class instances. It’s very low overhead, with dispatch_once_t being four or eight bytes, and not requiring a heavyweight lock every time it’s run.

©著作权归作者所有,转载或内容合作请联系作者
  • 序言:七十年代末,一起剥皮案震惊了整个滨河市,随后出现的几起案子,更是在滨河造成了极大的恐慌,老刑警刘岩,带你破解...
    沈念sama阅读 200,045评论 5 468
  • 序言:滨河连续发生了三起死亡事件,死亡现场离奇诡异,居然都是意外死亡,警方通过查阅死者的电脑和手机,发现死者居然都...
    沈念sama阅读 84,114评论 2 377
  • 文/潘晓璐 我一进店门,熙熙楼的掌柜王于贵愁眉苦脸地迎上来,“玉大人,你说我怎么就摊上这事。” “怎么了?”我有些...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 147,120评论 0 332
  • 文/不坏的土叔 我叫张陵,是天一观的道长。 经常有香客问我,道长,这世上最难降的妖魔是什么? 我笑而不...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 53,902评论 1 272
  • 正文 为了忘掉前任,我火速办了婚礼,结果婚礼上,老公的妹妹穿的比我还像新娘。我一直安慰自己,他们只是感情好,可当我...
    茶点故事阅读 62,828评论 5 360
  • 文/花漫 我一把揭开白布。 她就那样静静地躺着,像睡着了一般。 火红的嫁衣衬着肌肤如雪。 梳的纹丝不乱的头发上,一...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 48,132评论 1 277
  • 那天,我揣着相机与录音,去河边找鬼。 笑死,一个胖子当着我的面吹牛,可吹牛的内容都是我干的。 我是一名探鬼主播,决...
    沈念sama阅读 37,590评论 3 390
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我猛地睁开眼,长吁一口气:“原来是场噩梦啊……” “哼!你这毒妇竟也来了?” 一声冷哼从身侧响起,我...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 36,258评论 0 254
  • 序言:老挝万荣一对情侣失踪,失踪者是张志新(化名)和其女友刘颖,没想到半个月后,有当地人在树林里发现了一具尸体,经...
    沈念sama阅读 40,408评论 1 294
  • 正文 独居荒郊野岭守林人离奇死亡,尸身上长有42处带血的脓包…… 初始之章·张勋 以下内容为张勋视角 年9月15日...
    茶点故事阅读 35,335评论 2 317
  • 正文 我和宋清朗相恋三年,在试婚纱的时候发现自己被绿了。 大学时的朋友给我发了我未婚夫和他白月光在一起吃饭的照片。...
    茶点故事阅读 37,385评论 1 329
  • 序言:一个原本活蹦乱跳的男人离奇死亡,死状恐怖,灵堂内的尸体忽然破棺而出,到底是诈尸还是另有隐情,我是刑警宁泽,带...
    沈念sama阅读 33,068评论 3 315
  • 正文 年R本政府宣布,位于F岛的核电站,受9级特大地震影响,放射性物质发生泄漏。R本人自食恶果不足惜,却给世界环境...
    茶点故事阅读 38,660评论 3 303
  • 文/蒙蒙 一、第九天 我趴在偏房一处隐蔽的房顶上张望。 院中可真热闹,春花似锦、人声如沸。这庄子的主人今日做“春日...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 29,747评论 0 19
  • 文/苍兰香墨 我抬头看了看天上的太阳。三九已至,却和暖如春,着一层夹袄步出监牢的瞬间,已是汗流浃背。 一阵脚步声响...
    开封第一讲书人阅读 30,967评论 1 255
  • 我被黑心中介骗来泰国打工, 没想到刚下飞机就差点儿被人妖公主榨干…… 1. 我叫王不留,地道东北人。 一个月前我还...
    沈念sama阅读 42,406评论 2 346
  • 正文 我出身青楼,却偏偏与公主长得像,于是被迫代替她去往敌国和亲。 传闻我的和亲对象是个残疾皇子,可洞房花烛夜当晚...
    茶点故事阅读 41,970评论 2 341

推荐阅读更多精彩内容