其实在寒冰大佬的介绍种已经很详细了,但是还是要自己过一下才行
https://bbs.pediy.com/thread-252630.htm
ActivityThread
首先对比一下这里,看一下做了什么操作
-
handleBindApplication
绑定application的时候打了一句log
-
performLaunchActivity
启动activity的时候打了log,并且开线程开始dump
public static void fartthread() {
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
Log.e("ActivityThread", "start sleep,wait for fartthread start......");
Thread.sleep(1 * 60 * 1000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Log.e("ActivityThread", "sleep over and start fartthread");
fart();
Log.e("ActivityThread", "fart run over");
}
}).start();
}
睡60s,然后调用fart方法
public static void fart() {
ClassLoader appClassloader = getClassloader();
List<Object> dexFilesArray = new ArrayList<Object>();
Field pathList_Field = (Field) getClassField(appClassloader, "dalvik.system.BaseDexClassLoader", "pathList");
Object pathList_object = getFieldOjbect("dalvik.system.BaseDexClassLoader", appClassloader, "pathList");
Object[] ElementsArray = (Object[]) getFieldOjbect("dalvik.system.DexPathList", pathList_object, "dexElements");
Field dexFile_fileField = null;
try {
dexFile_fileField = (Field) getClassField(appClassloader, "dalvik.system.DexPathList$Element", "dexFile");
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Class DexFileClazz = null;
try {
DexFileClazz = appClassloader.loadClass("dalvik.system.DexFile");
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Method getClassNameList_method = null;
Method defineClass_method = null;
Method dumpDexFile_method = null;
Method dumpMethodCode_method = null;
for (Method field : DexFileClazz.getDeclaredMethods()) {
if (field.getName().equals("getClassNameList")) {
getClassNameList_method = field;
getClassNameList_method.setAccessible(true);
}
if (field.getName().equals("defineClassNative")) {
defineClass_method = field;
defineClass_method.setAccessible(true);
}
if (field.getName().equals("dumpMethodCode")) {
dumpMethodCode_method = field;
dumpMethodCode_method.setAccessible(true);
}
}
Field mCookiefield = getClassField(appClassloader, "dalvik.system.DexFile", "mCookie");
for (int j = 0; j < ElementsArray.length; j++) {
Object element = ElementsArray[j];
Object dexfile = null;
try {
dexfile = (Object) dexFile_fileField.get(element);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
if (dexfile == null) {
continue;
}
if (dexfile != null) {
dexFilesArray.add(dexfile);
Object mcookie = getClassFieldObject(appClassloader, "dalvik.system.DexFile", dexfile, "mCookie");
if (mcookie == null) {
continue;
}
String[] classnames = null;
try {
classnames = (String[]) getClassNameList_method.invoke(dexfile, mcookie);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
continue;
} catch (Error e) {
e.printStackTrace();
continue;
}
if (classnames != null) {
for (String eachclassname : classnames) {
loadClassAndInvoke(appClassloader, eachclassname, dumpMethodCode_method);
}
}
}
}
return;
}
这一串代码主要是拿到DexFile的Class,拿到所有dex的引用,循环遍历出className,然后传给loadClassAndInvoke方法。
public static void loadClassAndInvoke(ClassLoader appClassloader, String eachclassname, Method dumpMethodCode_method) {
Log.i("ActivityThread", "go into loadClassAndInvoke->" + "classname:" + eachclassname);
Class resultclass = null;
try {
resultclass = appClassloader.loadClass(eachclassname);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
return;
} catch (Error e) {
e.printStackTrace();
return;
}
if (resultclass != null) {
try {
Constructor<?> cons[] = resultclass.getDeclaredConstructors();
for (Constructor<?> constructor : cons) {
if (dumpMethodCode_method != null) {
try {
dumpMethodCode_method.invoke(null, constructor);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
continue;
} catch (Error e) {
e.printStackTrace();
continue;
}
} else {
Log.e("ActivityThread", "dumpMethodCode_method is null ");
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (Error e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
try {
Method[] methods = resultclass.getDeclaredMethods();
if (methods != null) {
for (Method m : methods) {
if (dumpMethodCode_method != null) {
try {
dumpMethodCode_method.invoke(null, m);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
continue;
} catch (Error e) {
e.printStackTrace();
continue;
}
} else {
Log.e("ActivityThread", "dumpMethodCode_method is null ");
}
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (Error e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
在这个方法中,会不断调用dumpMethodCode这个方法,传入构造函数与类中的方法。
而这个方法是DexFile中自定义添加的方法
static void DexFile_dumpMethodCode(JNIEnv* env, jclass,jobject method) {
ScopedFastNativeObjectAccess soa(env);
if(method!=nullptr)
{
ArtMethod* artmethod = ArtMethod::FromReflectedMethod(soa, method);
myfartInvoke(artmethod);
}
return;
}
ScopedObjectAccess的变体,它没有可运行的过渡。只能由“快速”使用
JNI方法。
ScopedFastNativeObjectAccess 。从翻译来讲,这东西只能用于fastJni模式中,暂时忽略这个方法
重点是下面的通过FromReflectedMethod方法拿到ArtMethod后,就调用myfartInvoke方法
art_method.cc
extern "C" void myfartInvoke(ArtMethod * artmethod)
SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED(Locks::mutator_lock_) {
JValue *result = nullptr;
Thread *self = nullptr;
uint32_t temp = 6;
uint32_t *args = &temp;
uint32_t args_size = 6;
artmethod->Invoke(self, args, args_size, result, "fart");
}
其中Thread指针是空
在Invoke中判断到是空即为自己构造的调用,
extern "C" void dumpArtMethod(ArtMethod * artmethod)
SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED(Locks::mutator_lock_) {
char *dexfilepath = (char *) malloc(sizeof(char) * 2000);
if (dexfilepath == nullptr) {
LOG(INFO) <<
"ArtMethod::dumpArtMethodinvoked,methodname:"
<< PrettyMethod(artmethod).
c_str() << "malloc 2000 byte failed";
return;
}
int fcmdline = -1;
char szCmdline[64] = { 0 };
char szProcName[256] = { 0 };
int procid = getpid();
sprintf(szCmdline, "/proc/%d/cmdline", procid);
fcmdline = open(szCmdline, O_RDONLY, 0644);
if (fcmdline > 0) {
read(fcmdline, szProcName, 256);
close(fcmdline);
}
if (szProcName[0]) {
const DexFile *dex_file = artmethod->GetDexFile();
const char *methodname =
PrettyMethod(artmethod).c_str();
const uint8_t *begin_ = dex_file->Begin();
size_t size_ = dex_file->Size();
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
int size_int_ = (int) size_;
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
sprintf(dexfilepath, "%s", "/sdcard/fart");
mkdir(dexfilepath, 0777);
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
sprintf(dexfilepath, "/sdcard/fart/%s",
szProcName);
mkdir(dexfilepath, 0777);
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
sprintf(dexfilepath,
"/sdcard/fart/%s/%d_dexfile.dex",
szProcName, size_int_);
int dexfilefp = open(dexfilepath, O_RDONLY, 0666);
if (dexfilefp > 0) {
close(dexfilefp);
dexfilefp = 0;
} else {
dexfilefp =
open(dexfilepath, O_CREAT | O_RDWR,
0666);
if (dexfilefp > 0) {
write(dexfilefp, (void *) begin_,
size_);
fsync(dexfilefp);
close(dexfilefp);
}
}
const DexFile::CodeItem * code_item =
artmethod->GetCodeItem();
if (LIKELY(code_item != nullptr)) {
int code_item_len = 0;
uint8_t *item = (uint8_t *) code_item;
if (code_item->tries_size_ > 0) {
const uint8_t *handler_data =
(const uint8_t *) (DexFile::
GetTryItems
(*code_item,
code_item->
tries_size_));
uint8_t *tail =
codeitem_end(&handler_data);
code_item_len =
(int) (tail - item);
} else {
code_item_len =
16 +
code_item->
insns_size_in_code_units_ * 2;
}
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
int size_int = (int) dex_file->Size(); // Length of data
uint32_t method_idx =
artmethod->get_method_idx();
sprintf(dexfilepath,
"/sdcard/fart/%s/%d_%ld.bin",
szProcName, size_int, gettidv1());
int fp2 =
open(dexfilepath,
O_CREAT | O_APPEND | O_RDWR,
0666);
if (fp2 > 0) {
lseek(fp2, 0, SEEK_END);
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
int offset = (int) (item - begin_);
sprintf(dexfilepath,
"{name:%s,method_idx:%d,offset:%d,code_item_len:%d,ins:",
methodname, method_idx,
offset, code_item_len);
int contentlength = 0;
while (dexfilepath[contentlength]
!= 0)
contentlength++;
write(fp2, (void *) dexfilepath,
contentlength);
long outlen = 0;
char *base64result =
base64_encode((char *) item,
(long)
code_item_len,
&outlen);
write(fp2, base64result, outlen);
write(fp2, "};", 2);
fsync(fp2);
close(fp2);
if (base64result != nullptr) {
free(base64result);
base64result = nullptr;
}
}
}
}
if (dexfilepath != nullptr) {
free(dexfilepath);
dexfilepath = nullptr;
}
}
这里代码主要是根据artmethod的base和length 把dex dump出来
然后再获取codeItem。
这里codeitem分两种,带try和不带try,因此要区分不同,不然dump下来的指令可能不全
读取一个无符号的LEB128值,将给定的指针更新为point
刚好超过读取值的末尾。这个功能可以容忍
第五个编码字节中的非零高阶位。
这个地方的codeitem_end不知道是计算个啥,虽然知道最后结果是计算出末尾的地址,然后减去开头就是长度,但是这个计算过程还是不是很了解
uint8_t *codeitem_end(const uint8_t ** pData) {
uint32_t num_of_list = DecodeUnsignedLeb128(pData);
for (; num_of_list > 0; num_of_list--) {
int32_t num_of_handlers =
DecodeSignedLeb128(pData);
int num = num_of_handlers;
if (num_of_handlers <= 0) {
num = -num_of_handlers;
}
for (; num > 0; num--) {
DecodeUnsignedLeb128(pData);
DecodeUnsignedLeb128(pData);
}
if (num_of_handlers <= 0) {
DecodeUnsignedLeb128(pData);
}
}
return (uint8_t *) (*pData);
}
虽然不懂是怎么计算的,但是通过搜索可以发现
dexhunter,fupk3中也用到了这段代码。总之就是计算出了codeitem的大小。
这段中的128是编码方式
https://blog.csdn.net/new_abc/article/details/36412081
初次之外,还有一个方法是dumpDex的
extern "C" void dumpDexFileByExecute(ArtMethod * artmethod)
SHARED_LOCKS_REQUIRED(Locks::mutator_lock_) {
char *dexfilepath = (char *) malloc(sizeof(char) * 2000);
if (dexfilepath == nullptr) {
LOG(INFO) <<
"ArtMethod::dumpDexFileByExecute,methodname:"
<< PrettyMethod(artmethod).
c_str() << "malloc 2000 byte failed";
return;
}
int fcmdline = -1;
char szCmdline[64] = { 0 };
char szProcName[256] = { 0 };
int procid = getpid();
sprintf(szCmdline, "/proc/%d/cmdline", procid);
fcmdline = open(szCmdline, O_RDONLY, 0644);
if (fcmdline > 0) {
read(fcmdline, szProcName, 256);
close(fcmdline);
}
if (szProcName[0]) {
const DexFile *dex_file = artmethod->GetDexFile();
const uint8_t *begin_ = dex_file->Begin(); // Start of data.
size_t size_ = dex_file->Size(); // Length of data.
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
int size_int_ = (int) size_;
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
sprintf(dexfilepath, "%s", "/sdcard/fart");
mkdir(dexfilepath, 0777);
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
sprintf(dexfilepath, "/sdcard/fart/%s",
szProcName);
mkdir(dexfilepath, 0777);
memset(dexfilepath, 0, 2000);
sprintf(dexfilepath,
"/sdcard/fart/%s/%d_dexfile_execute.dex",
szProcName, size_int_);
int dexfilefp = open(dexfilepath, O_RDONLY, 0666);
if (dexfilefp > 0) {
close(dexfilefp);
dexfilefp = 0;
} else {
dexfilefp =
open(dexfilepath, O_CREAT | O_RDWR,
0666);
if (dexfilefp > 0) {
write(dexfilefp, (void *) begin_,
size_);
fsync(dexfilefp);
close(dexfilefp);
}
}
}
if (dexfilepath != nullptr) {
free(dexfilepath);
dexfilepath = nullptr;
}
}
在解释模式下,如果判断到有初始化函数,也就是init,即构造函数。就dempdex。而在activityThread中,我们刚好就调用了构造函数的主动调用链
整个fart的调用链就是大概是这样的。这是我的见解